QUOTE (rememberearth @ Sep 29 2008, 08:57 PM)

i want people in elected positions to stop lying and appointing liars or those who scratched their backs at one point and time.
i want to be able to trust people in elected positions to appoint others who do not further their agendas and line their wallets.
its a stretch but at one time it happened.
1) Do you see that happening any time soon or ever?
2) Do you really think doing nothing, which is essentially what the no vote was, is going to work better than doing something?
It doesn't matter what institution is set up you'll come across the same problems of dependability. You want universal healthcare but given your statements here you don't want to give government the ability to give it to you. You want a renewable energy initiative, but you'd probably deny that power to the government as well. You're working to elect Barack Obama expecting some kind of change, but from what you've said you probably still wouldn't give even him the ability to change the country for you.
How do you think they're going to administer universal healthcare if it comes to pass? They're just going to leave a big trough of money out front with a sign that says, "private citizens only"? Of course not, you'd be mental to think so. They'll set up a 'gasp' committee or a bureau, probably with a Secretary, maybe the Surgeon General to administrate the program. Are they going to be trustworthy? Whomever they are they'll be appointed by the President what with it having to be part of the executive branch, separation of powers etc.
Look, you can either think the government is going to be competent or not. You don't get to play both sides of this where it's competent enough for universal healthcare but not enough for economic policy.
Me, I don't trust the government. I just trust them more than I trust business.
Also, the spoils system has been in place since Jackson was President.