Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: How many years will it take to repair the mess the Bush Administration made?
Randi Rhodes Message Board > Main Forums > General Discussion
IndpendentConserLibertar
Any estimations?
rememberearth
i venture a guess of 12 years at the least, at the most 30. and that's being hopeful.
gutterballz
a generation mellow.gif
IndpendentConserLibertar
QUOTE (gutterballz @ Sep 29 2008, 10:05 PM) *
a generation mellow.gif


That's like 30 years.
rememberearth
i think we need to cut the shit.
there are those who say that Clinton profited from raygun.
those who say that Carter got the bulk of the economic strain from nixon.
after this criminal is out, there will be those who say that a future prez will profit from his economics.
where did this come from? who's right?
i know, but perhaps we should push the issue on those when they start their dribble, so that way we can remind them and this doesn't happen again.
a thought.
Christine
QUOTE (IndpendentConserLibertar @ Sep 29 2008, 08:01 PM) *
Any estimations?


A whole generation...they left us a big damn mess.
ohnoohyes
I say one day.
November 4 2008 we can make it all go away…
Time for Obama to be decisive and say lets take care of this business after the election, after we clean house. He should say we will take care of any shortfalls with the present budget by reallocating money from defense, the war in Iraq, eliminating waste and closing the loopholes that are selling out the middle class and America itself. In the mean time, Wall Street has to take responsibility for either profiting or losing on their portfolios. Either jump off the ledge or get back inside and get to work.
IndpendentConserLibertar
The amazing part, Bush would have been one of the "greatest presidents" in history if he just stayed in Afghanistan and found Osama Bin Laden.

He did have like 90 percent approve ratings after 9/11.

Then he strayed off big time.
IndpendentConserLibertar
QUOTE (rememberearth @ Sep 29 2008, 10:09 PM) *
i think we need to cut the shit.
there are those who say that Clinton profited from raygun.
those who say that Carter got the bulk of the economic strain from nixon.
after this criminal is out, there will be those who say that a future prez will profit from his economics.
where did this come from? who's right?
i know, but perhaps we should push the issue on those when they start their dribble, so that way we can remind them and this doesn't happen again.
a thought.


I think those things are in the past now.

After today, it's a new day.
rememberearth
QUOTE (IndpendentConserLibertar @ Sep 29 2008, 10:21 PM) *
I think those things are in the past now.

After today, it's a new day.

yes well reality is a ghost.
and those who learn nothing of the past are doomed to repeat the same mistakes.
LibLaw
This is a whole new day folks. Fortunes were lost today but then like someone said there are bargains to be had so today a potential new millionaire was born that person bought something that in 20 years will be worth it.

Think about this 1,000,000,000,000,000.00... lost today
IndpendentConserLibertar
QUOTE (LibLaw @ Sep 29 2008, 10:41 PM) *
This is a whole new day folks. Fortunes were lost today but then like someone said there are bargains to be had so today a potential new millionaire was born that person bought something that in 20 years will be worth it.

Think about this 1,000,000,000,000,000.00... lost today


Still not worth it yet, to much volatility in the market, unless you are rich to begin with.

This is why none of it is good for the market. Nobody wants to spend the money, and the market doesn't move, but nobody wants to lose their money either.

But, that's what you call a "free market". rolleyes.gif

What's the worst that could happened, another company wants a bail out.
rememberearth
QUOTE (IndpendentConserLibertar @ Sep 29 2008, 11:04 PM) *
Still not worth it yet, to much volatility in the market, unless you are rich to begin with.

This is why none of it is good for the market. Nobody wants to spend the money, and the market doesn't move, but nobody wants to lose their money either.

But, that's what you call a "free market". rolleyes.gif

What's the worst that could happened, another company wants a bail out.

ah, but that's the past right. rolleyes.gif
LibLaw
QUOTE (IndpendentConserLibertar @ Sep 29 2008, 11:04 PM) *
Still not worth it yet, to much volatility in the market, unless you are rich to begin with.

This is why none of it is good for the market. Nobody wants to spend the money, and the market doesn't move, but nobody wants to lose their money either.

But, that's what you call a "free market". rolleyes.gif

What's the worst that could happened, another company wants a bail out.

and there are other investments that the wealthy move to. I bet gold and precious metals went through the roof.
IndpendentConserLibertar
QUOTE (rememberearth @ Sep 29 2008, 11:14 PM) *
ah, but that's the past right. rolleyes.gif


Yeah, you can only hope.
rememberearth
QUOTE (IndpendentConserLibertar @ Sep 29 2008, 11:18 PM) *
Yeah, you can only hope.

only quoting what you had said.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.