Ok. I understand how and why Republican operatives are claiming that Sarah Palin did a great job in the debate last week. That’s their job. That’s their goal. But the average voter? Are you kidding? I actually read where one person said that Sarah Palin has shown just how much a woman can accomplish.
Really? Seriously?
Does anyone think that dodging questions, winking at the camera and spewing rhetoric that is used unedited by Saturday Night Live in comedy skits, is the best that a woman can accomplish as a Vice Presidential nominee? If so, I think that’s pretty scary stuff. It shows how low the expectations are that have been set for Sarah Palin, and it shows how her inclusion onto the Republican ticket has actually hurt women in our country.
I’m old enough to remember an era when women were treated as naïve innocents, and when a woman expressed a genuine original thought the male response was a pat on the hand, a patronizing comment, and a suggestion to stick to the less complex work of cleaning the house. Through the sixties a hard fought battle ensued led by women who wanted more options in their lives. These women wanted to earn their own way in life without having to be dependent on a man for support. Their push for equality through the 70s and 80s slowly gave rise to the acceptance of women as not only workers, but as managers and executives.
At first, the acceptance of women into lower level jobs wasn’t a push. The expectations of women were so low that they could easily get low-pay jobs. But, as women began to show their true abilities, as they began to move up the corporate chain of command, the men who felt threatened began to raise the bar. Soon, the measures for a woman to achieve a high-pay position were much higher than those of men. For women to achieve, they had to work much harder for a lot less.
In recent years the playing field has leveled off some. As more and more women reach higher levels of management, the expectations have started to become more equal. Even though there’s still a lot of work to do, the situation has been steadily improving.
Enter Sarah Palin.
While some laud her as an example of what women can achieve, Sarah Palin truly represents the antithesis of what women have been trying to accomplish. Think about it. How low were the expectations for her in the debate? How many polls indicated that people felt she showed a greater knowledge than they thought she had? – AND SHE DIDN’T EVEN ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!!
Can you imagine Geraldine Ferraro or Elizabeth Dole or Sandra Day O’Connor dodging questions in a debate the way that Palin did this past week? I can’t. These women are experienced, knowledgeable and have too much respect for other women than to do anything but reflect class and intelligence. But they know the struggle. They know that their achievements were accomplished with the help of those before them. And they know that their achievements – good or bad – will have an affect on those women who come after them.
Sarah Palin doesn’t get this. I really don’t think that she even realizes the harm that she’s causing. She’s taken the expectations, the hopes and dreams of women and driven them back to the 1950s. She’s June Cleaver. She’s bright and cheery and folksy and ready to do whatever the men in charge tell her to do. This shouldn’t be surprising. She was picked, and is guided by, old white men who grew up in the 1940s and 1950s when women were in that subservient role and held to a different standard - a double-standard that the Republicans seem to be bringing back.
I don’t know what’s happened to the media in this country that they’re going along with this charade. In 1984, Vice Presidential candidate Geraldine Ferraro would have been eaten alive by the press if she had conducted herself the way that Sarah Palin has. It appears to me that most women today are, and should be, offended by Sarah Palin.
I think it’s time for the media to reset the standard and start treating Sarah Palin like she’s a Vice Presidential nominee.





