Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Ask a Mormon
Randi Rhodes Message Board > Main Forums > Focused Interests > Religion
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34
enufalrdy
Mormons are insane, and the worst kind of apologists...must see ------> http://treytable.blogspot.com/2007/08/morm...ing-insane.html
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 09:47 AM) *
There are often rumors etc. in circulation about such things as you ask about. But Church leaders tend to leave things like that between the married couple and the Lord. If someone was trying to force their spouse to do something they didn't want to do, some counsel from their bishop might be considered in order. Some other Latter-day Saints might disagree, but I know of no revelation or written counsel from the Senior Brethren of the LDS Church that prohibits married people from engaging in mutually satisfying sexual behavior. Sexual relations outside of marriage of course are considered serious sins against God.


So if my partner and i get married in Vancouver BC, which we will probably do one of these days, does that mean that God would be okay with our having sex in Canada but but he wouldn't be happy about it if we had sex in the US except for in CA and MA? Assuming of course that CA and MA recognized our Canadian marriage.
visionari
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 02:49 PM) *
So if my partner and i get married in Vancouver BC, which we will probably do one of these days, does that mean that God would be okay with our having sex in Canada but but he wouldn't be happy about it if we had sex in the US except for in CA and MA? Assuming of course that CA and MA recognized our Canadian marriage.

Hey, don't forget New York!

NPR

Tyo
QUOTE (visionari @ Jun 3 2008, 12:03 PM) *
Hey, don't forget New York!

Oh yeah, that's right. Amend that to add New York. cool.gif

Not Utah though.
justamere10
QUOTE (enufalrdy @ Jun 3 2008, 12:41 PM) *
Mormons are insane, and the worst kind of apologists...must see ------> http://treytable.blogspot.com/2007/08/morm...ing-insane.html



All 13,000,000 of us?
justamere10
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 12:49 PM) *
So if my partner and i get married in Vancouver BC, which we will probably do one of these days, does that mean that God would be okay with our having sex in Canada but but he wouldn't be happy about it if we had sex in the US except for in CA and MA? Assuming of course that CA and MA recognized our Canadian marriage.



I can't speak for God of course but as long as a man and woman are legally married somewhere I would think sexual relations between the two of them would probably be ok with Him.
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 12:48 PM) *
All 13,000,000 of us?


No, there are probably quite a few who just go along with in order to keep peace in the family and not make waves.
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 12:50 PM) *
I can't speak for God of course but as long as a man and woman are legally married somewhere I would think sexual relations between the two of them would probably be ok with Him.


What if a man and a man are legally married somewhere?
justamere10
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 01:54 PM) *
No, there are probably quite a few who just go along with in order to keep peace in the family and not make waves.



What a relief. (Wipes forehead.)

You have some very strange notions about the Latter-day Saints.
visionari
deleted
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 12:56 PM) *
What a relief. (Wipes forehead.)

You have some very strange notions about the Latter-day Saints.


I'm sure I do, but in reading over this thread I don't think that I have as many strange notions about the Latter Day Saints as they have about themselves.
justamere10
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 01:56 PM) *
What if a man and a man are legally married somewhere?



Adam and Eve were male and female. I think God had some very excellent reasons for making it so. Marriage between a man and a woman has been the basic family unit of American society for hundreds of years. It works!

Why should today be any different?

But I don't want to get off onto another topic entirely, just to address the religious aspect. Suffice it to say that it is my opinion that God will never sanction a marriage other than between a man and woman regardless of what secular judges and legislators have to say about the matter.

Marriage is a sacrament in many churches. There may be a legal "marriage" in the eyes of the laws of the land, but that is where it will likely remain. Though of course there will be some exceptions among some clergy and maybe some denominations. Sexual relations outside of marriage that is sanctioned by God, in my opinion, will always be a serious sin that will ultimately result in eternal consequences.
justamere10
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 02:01 PM) *
I'm sure I do, but in reading over this thread I don't think that I have as many strange notions about the Latter Day Saints as they have about themselves.



To us they are not strange. :-)
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 01:11 PM) *
Marriage is a sacrament in many churches. There may be a legal "marriage" in the eyes of the laws of the land, but that is where it will likely remain. Though of course there will be some exceptions among some clergy and maybe some denominations. Sexual relations outside of marriage that is sanctioned by God, in my opinion, will always be a serious sin that will ultimately result in eternal consequences.


Which is absolutely fine with me. I know of no one who is interested in forcing churches to sanctify marriages that they don't approve of. What would be the point? And as for me, I don't want my marriage to take place anywhere near a church.

But some churches will and do sanctify same sex marriages. Would sanctification by the UCC, for example or maybe a liberal Anglican church count in the eyes of God or would it have to be a Mormon ceremony before He would view it as valid.
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 01:12 PM) *
To us they are not strange. :-)


Well they wouldn't, would they??
justamere10
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 02:18 PM) *
Which is absolutely fine with me. I know of no one who is interested in forcing churches to sanctify marriages that they don't approve of. What would be the point? And as for me, I don't want my marriage to take place anywhere near a church.

But some churches will and do sanctify same sex marriages. Would sanctification by the UCC, for example or maybe a liberal Anglican church count in the eyes of God or would it have to be a Mormon ceremony before He would view it as valid.


Again, I can't speak for Him but I think God recognizes all legal marriages between a man and a woman as valid regardless of the country and century. What some secular judges and legislators are doing now to change this nation and do away with Judaeo Christian principles and values that have worked for hundreds of years is not likely to sway God, or to moot the eternal consequences of unrepented sin.

Everyone has choices to make, that's what we're here on earth for, to prepare to meet God.
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 01:29 PM) *
Again, I can't speak for Him but I think God recognizes all legal marriages between a man and a woman as valid regardless of the country and century. What some secular judges and legislators are doing now to change this nation and do away with Judaeo Christian principles and values that have worked for hundreds of years is not likely to sway God, or to moot the eternal consequences of unrepented sin.

Everyone has choices to make, that's what we're here on earth for, to prepare to meet God.


That really doesn't answer the question regarding the LDS position on same sex marriages sanctified by other Christian denominations.
justamere10
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 02:34 PM) *
That really doesn't answer the question regarding the LDS position on same sex marriages sanctified by other Christian denominations.



I thought I was quite clear on that. I can't begin to imagine a time when God would reveal to His Prophet that it's acceptable to Him for people of the same gender to marry. That flies in the face of everything I know about the sanctity of marriage and the eternal family unit. It will never happen...
visionari
justamere, you do realize that those of us outside the Mormon faith have trouble seeing how this kind of position is any different from what Mormons said about black people just a few years ago, don't you?
justamere10
QUOTE (visionari @ Jun 3 2008, 02:44 PM) *
justamere, you do realize that those of us outside the Mormon faith have trouble seeing how this kind of position is any different from what Mormons said about black people just a few years ago, don't you?


I already explained about the skin color situation, but I understand where you are going with this, not everyone will agree with LDS religious beliefs and practices. I am personally content that God speaks to a living Prophet in our time to guide and direct His Church in changing times, and that I have a place within His Church.

But marriage and family is the way God's children on earth come the closest to being as God is. He is the literal Father of our spirit bodies. Life, the universe and everything, as I see it, is just a family matter. I know from the emphasis God places on certain temple ordinances that it is extremely important to Him that husbands and wives (male and female) be sealed for eternity, and their children sealed to them. To tamper with marriage and family, in my opinion, must be grossly abominable to Him, more so perhaps than almost any other sin.

That's the way I see it. Everyone else of course is free to choose their own course and follow the fads and trends towards greater materialism and godlessness that are all around us in America today, or to turn to God for the answer to life's problems.

Here's a good place to begin the latter route: http://www.mormon.org
Tyo
QUOTE
That's the way I see it. Everyone else of course is free to choose their own course and follow the fads and trends towards greater materialism and godlessness that are all around us in America today, or to turn to God for the answer to life's problems.

Here's a good place to begin the latter route: http://www.mormon.org


So you are a cyber-missionary. wink.gif

justamere10
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 03:17 PM) *
So you are a cyber-missionary. wink.gif


I kind of like that title but I'm just a retired person who enjoys writing about his religious beliefs on the internet. Thanks for what I would consider to be a compliment.
CowboySteve
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 08:56 AM) *
Latter-day Saints are bound by their canon, not by the comments and opinions of Church leaders who may or may not have been speaking for the Lord when their comments were recorded or reported by someone. It is common for LDS critics to reach into myriads of writings and pull out things they then try to impose on the entire church and its members regardless of sometimes hundreds or thousands of other comments that provide the real context.


Now, hold on just a minute, here.


If I can't trust Brigham Young, the Second Leader of the Church of LDS, to correctly represent the perspective and opinion of the Church of LDS when he says "Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race?" what trust should I put in a fellow on cyberspace going by just a handle, justamere10, who claims to accurately represent the LDS Church? What if you're an apostate spreading false doctrine? Not meaning to insult, but how can I read your writing with any assumption of validity?
CowboySteve
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 02:29 PM) *
What some secular judges and legislators are doing now to change this nation and do away with Judaeo Christian principles and values that have worked for hundreds of years is not likely to sway God, or to moot the eternal consequences of unrepented sin.


Would you consider the trend towards legal permissibility of divorce to be a betrayal of Christian principles and values? Is that a secular overthrow of Christian principles and values in the United States?


QUOTE (Mk_10)
But Jesus said to them, "Because of your hardness of heart he wrote you this commandment.
But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh.
What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.
In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again.
And He said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery.
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 02:49 PM) *
I kind of like that title but I'm just a retired person who enjoys writing about his religious beliefs on the internet. Thanks for what I would consider to be a compliment.


Oh, you're welcome. rolleyes.gif
Tyo
Jesus never really mentioned gays I think, but it looks like he was all over the divorce thing and he obviously didn't like it. Sooo...
Christian
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 2 2008, 09:15 PM) *
I don't know if this applies to you but there is a saying about the LDS Church: "You can leave the Church, but you can't leave the Church alone." Often apostates of the LDS Church become bitter enemies, once having enjoyed the Holy Ghost and fellowship with the Saints, then having abandoned their cherished beliefs and broken their covenants with God.

There is a way back through sincere repentance, but it's difficult.
Wow, condescend much? Yes, that was a rhetorical question. rolleyes.gif I know it's hard for you to believe, but there are many many former Mormons who have left the LDS Church and have embraced orthodox Christianity and have found the joy and fulfillment in their life that was missing in the LDS church. Why is it that Mormons ALWAYS assume that if a person leaves the LDS church that it's because they have committed some grievous sin? Many have left because they have found the truth and the truth has set them free.
Christian
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 2 2008, 09:26 PM) *
There is no LDS revelation about a Heavenly Mother, it is mere speculation.
So the following quote from official LDS source is nothing more than idle speculation and not being taught in LDS meeting houses, ever?

"All human beings—male and female—are created in the image of God. Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents, and, as such, each has a divine nature and destiny." The Family: A Proclamation to the World. http://www.lds.org/library/display/0,4945,161-1-11-1,00.html

Is this "Proclamation" merely "speculation"?
QUOTE
Adam and Eve were the first human beings on this planet. The physical bodies of all human beings born on this earth are descended from those two.

The spirit body of Adam was created by Heavenly Father, the same as was yours and mine. I do not know how the physical body of Adam was created, the scriptures say that God made it from the dust of the earth. (Or something like that.)

The spirit children God created are His "eternal increase." Mormons believe that only those who make certain choices and take upon themselves certain covenants and ordinances and live faithful to them will be "exalted" to the highest 'mansion' of the highest (Celestial) kingdom, the place where God dwells. Such resurrected exalted beings after much additional preparation and training, in our belief, will be authorized to have "eternal increase". They will share everything God the Father has, similar to minor children living at home share what their parents have.
How can you have "eternal increase" with only a male but no females? Assuming, of course, you believe God is a male being.
visionari
QUOTE (Christian @ Jun 3 2008, 06:55 PM) *
Why is it that Mormons ALWAYS assume that if a person leaves the LDS church that it's because they have committed some grievous sin? Many have left because they have found the truth and the truth has set them free.

clap.gif
RealLiberal1
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 09:10 AM) *
If obeying God's commandments and helping with the work He does to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of His children is "idolatry" in your eyes, then so be it, for you.

There are some ordinances that must take place on earth. God has provided His own way and place for that work to be done.


So...now we're "cherry picking" to determine what Commandments are valid.

How about humanity???

Look at how many homeless can be housed and fed for the price of one of your beautiful temple. How do you justify that?

This is why religion in America is failing. People are waking up to the hypocrisy.
disfigured
QUOTE (Christian @ Jun 3 2008, 06:55 PM) *
Why is it that Mormons ALWAYS assume that if a person leaves the LDS church that it's because they have committed some grievous sin? Many have left because they have found the truth and the truth has set them free.


Because that's how a cult works, if it didn't do these things it wouldn't survive. Even more traditional religions have that cult like atmosphere and adherence running through them. How would any of it survive if no "rules" were ever enforced in some way? It wouldn't, that's the truth of it.

The thing about Mormon is, the "hook" is so outrageously phantasmagorical I can't imagine what kind of sap would fall for it. Then again I've met a few Mormons in my day and I can't say they were the sharpest tools in the shed.




justamere10
QUOTE (CowboySteve @ Jun 3 2008, 04:19 PM) *

Now, hold on just a minute, here.


If I can't trust Brigham Young, the Second Leader of the Church of LDS, to correctly represent the perspective and opinion of the Church of LDS when he says "Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race?" what trust should I put in a fellow on cyberspace going by just a handle, justamere10, who claims to accurately represent the LDS Church? What if you're an apostate spreading false doctrine? Not meaning to insult, but how can I read your writing with any assumption of validity?


I DO NOT represent the LDS Church, nor did I ever claim to. I speak only for myself. But I am confident that I can represent quite accurately the beliefs of many active informed mainstream Mormons. You are welcome to speak with Brother Brigham if you can reach him, I'm sure he knows a whole lot more about Mormons than I do. If you can't reach him, you are invited to ask me as a very poor second.

As you know, skin color is not an issue anymore since the 1978 revelation to the then-living Prophet, so why let it trouble you? Latter-day Saints are very secure in their beliefs, they loved their black brothers and sisters as much as anyone all through the days when blacks weren't even allowed in many other USA churches. Shall we move on?
justamere10
QUOTE (CowboySteve @ Jun 3 2008, 04:27 PM) *
Would you consider the trend towards legal permissibility of divorce to be a betrayal of Christian principles and values? Is that a secular overthrow of Christian principles and values in the United States?


The frequency of divorce is definetly a social problem in our society with all too many children growing up in single parent homes and not having the benefit of witnessing both male and female role models in their home.

But contrast that with the laws in some countries such as the Philippines where there is no divorce, only possible anullments after seven years of separation. That obviously creates many long-term social problems too.

Notta perfect world...
justamere10
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 04:40 PM) *
Jesus never really mentioned gays I think, but it looks like he was all over the divorce thing and he obviously didn't like it. Sooo...


Are you suggesting because there is a high prevalence of divorce in our nation that Jesus therefore approves of "marriage" between people of the same gender?
justamere10
QUOTE (Christian @ Jun 3 2008, 04:55 PM) *
Wow, condescend much? Yes, that was a rhetorical question. rolleyes.gif I know it's hard for you to believe, but there are many many former Mormons who have left the LDS Church and have embraced orthodox Christianity and have found the joy and fulfillment in their life that was missing in the LDS church. Why is it that Mormons ALWAYS assume that if a person leaves the LDS church that it's because they have committed some grievous sin? Many have left because they have found the truth and the truth has set them free.


I don't know about the "many many" part, but if you say you left the LDS Church for the "joy and fulfillment" of membership in an "orthodox" church then I guess there is at least one, and probably more former Saints who have done that. Isn't freedom of choice wonderful. I wish you much continued joy and fulfillment. You must be secure in your new beliefs if you are having so much joy in them, so I expect that you'd never even think of attacking those other beliefs that you once cherished but abandoned.
justamere10
QUOTE (Christian @ Jun 3 2008, 05:17 PM) *
So the following quote from official LDS source is nothing more than idle speculation and not being taught in LDS meeting houses, ever?

"All human beings—male and female—are created in the image of God. Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents, and, as such, each has a divine nature and destiny." The Family: A Proclamation to the World. http://www.lds.org/library/display/0,4945,161-1-11-1,00.html

Is this "Proclamation" merely "speculation"?
How can you have "eternal increase" with only a male but no females? Assuming, of course, you believe God is a male being.


That is an interesting observation, I never noticed that before. But I'm certain that the Brethren were not intending to create new doctrine or to proclaim a revelation that there is a Heavenly Mother with that inspired proclamation about families.

I'm sure you will agree that God's name is tossed around irreverently just about everwhere in America nowadays. The mocking would surely be much more severe if it was revealed that God had a wife don't you think? I repeat that I know of no revelation that specifically proclaims as LDS doctrine that there is a Mother in Heaven. It sure makes sense to me that there would be though...
justamere10
QUOTE (RealLiberal1 @ Jun 3 2008, 05:58 PM) *
So...now we're "cherry picking" to determine what Commandments are valid.

How about humanity???

Look at how many homeless can be housed and fed for the price of one of your beautiful temple. How do you justify that?

This is why religion in America is failing. People are waking up to the hypocrisy.


The LDS Church is well known for taking a lead in charitable work. It is also well-known for keeping God's commandment to His Saints to build and operate temples.

Anyway, your screen name proclaims that you are a liberal. Isn't big government supposed to house and feed the poor? Why should the tithing of ordinary struggling church members take on that burden?
madame-defarge
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 08:23 AM) *
Temple recommends are renewed every two years. The process is a worthiness interview with the bishop (equivalent of a Catholic parish priest) and a stake president (equivalent of a Catholic bishop) or one of their two counselors. Nowadays temple recommends are bar encoded and hooked up to computers for better verification.

Anyone can enter a dedicated operating LDS Temple. But they must first enter in at the strait gate of faith in Jesus Christ, baptism by immersion for the remission of sins, laying on of hands of the authorized Priesthood for the gift of the Holy Ghost, and a godly worthy walk for at least a year before temple recommend interviews.


Wait! Just a minute here, justa... Do you mean to tell us that Mormon Bishops and stake presidents are Celibate too???? Who knew????? There's a p.r. campaign chomping at the bit to counter-balance all the FLDS media going down around town.

Have to admit though, you got me to pull out the Swedenborg (Swedish Mystic 1688-1742). An Adept. Found these passages which I feel are sure flavoring for the conversation at hand:

"As man is formed, so is he perfected in intelligence and wisdom, and becomes a man. No man is a man from his natural mind; from that he is rather a beast. He becomes a man through intelligence and wisdom from the Lord, and so far as he is intelligent and wise he is a beautiful man and an angel of heaven. But so far as he rejects, suffocates, and perverts the truths and goods of the Word... and... rejects intelligences and wisdom, so far he is a monster and not a man, because he is so far a devil"....

"God, in accordance with his laws, is able to remit sins to any man only so far as the man, in accordance with his laws, refrains from them. God is able to regenerate a man spiritually only so far as the man, in accordance with his laws regenerates himself naturally. God is in an unceasing endeavor to regenerate man, and thus save him. But this He is unable to accomplish except as man prepares himself as a receptacle, and thus levels the way and opens the door for God."
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 05:39 PM) *
Are you suggesting because there is a high prevalence of divorce in our nation that Jesus therefore approves of "marriage" between people of the same gender?


I think that if you are truly concerned about marriage and the sanctity thereof you might want to push for making divorce illegal or at least forbidding Mormons to take advantage it.

Who knows whether or not Jesus would have approved of same-sex marriage? He's not on record as having expressed an opinion. But he or his creators were pretty clear on divorce it seems like. Yet, Mormons get divorced every day. According to the link, which references a Utah State University site (it's a few years old, but I doubt that things have changed much) the marriage rate in Utah is slightly higher than the national average. So is the divorce rate. Even though Jesus was pretty unambiguous in his condemnation of splitting the sheets.
RealLiberal1
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 07:56 PM) *
The LDS Church is well known for taking a lead in charitable work. It is also well-known for keeping God's commandment to His Saints to build and operate temples.

Anyway, your screen name proclaims that you are a liberal. Isn't big government supposed to house and feed the poor? Why should the tithing of ordinary struggling church members take on that burden?


The temples are tax-exempt and I'm fairly certain that your savior , Jesus Christ would do this
Like I said...when the number of religious-funded missions outnumber the churches/temples because of religious organization's good works, I'll be less critical.
The members are struggling because your churches are taking at least 10% from them...and that's minimal tithing/pledge.

You're supposed to help the poor, give your brethren your best coat, etc.





madame-defarge
QUOTE (Seeker1 @ Jun 3 2008, 09:11 AM) *
The problem is, unlike most other Christians, there are two texts they draw upon. So to me the more interesting question is not just whether they take a literal reading of the Bible (many fundamentalists do), but do they read the Book of Mormon literally?

Because, and I hate to say this, but speaking from the point of view of archaeology, the Book of Mormon tells a story of the peopling of this continent that is not true. Native Americans do not show any linguistic, genetic, or artefactual evidence that they came from Semitic countries. In fact, Native Americans were here to North America 25,000 years ago, when there were no Hebrews or Canaanites.

I think it could be interesting as an allegory... one of the things I have noted from doing research with Native people here in the U.S. is that they are actively proselytized by the Mormons, because seeking their "redemption" is considered the most important. Almost every Native reservation in the West has an active Mormon church.


You know Seeker, I wouldn't understimate the influence of Native American lands in the North East, certainly in the 19th century (and well into the 20th century, really). In Joseph Smith's time, Upstate NY must have been quite filled with disembodied Indians roaming the haunted wilderness of steep hills and grand forrests, filling the finger lakes full of whispering spirits who never do quite crossed over....

Another area that is becoming an active place of missionary work is "family tree" workshops in Black communities (and on the web). A way of identifyng family lines and "baptising post mortem"
CowboySteve
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 06:25 PM) *
I DO NOT represent the LDS Church, nor did I ever claim to. I speak only for myself. But I am confident that I can represent quite accurately the beliefs of many active informed mainstream Mormons. You are welcome to speak with Brother Brigham if you can reach him, I'm sure he knows a whole lot more about Mormons than I do. If you can't reach him, you are invited to ask me as a very poor second.

As you know, skin color is not an issue anymore since the 1978 revelation to the then-living Prophet, so why let it trouble you? Latter-day Saints are very secure in their beliefs, they loved their black brothers and sisters as much as anyone all through the days when blacks weren't even allowed in many other USA churches. Shall we move on?


First, I just want to apologize if I seem too harsh. The price of advocacy of a position or another is rigorous scrutiny. I certainly do not wish to seem contemptuous towards you in my probing of the underpinnings of LDS, nor to cause you more discomfort than that which comes from vigorous inquiry.

I see the racism of America manifested in the church, and am pleased that it has been addressed.
RealLiberal1
quote from justamere10:
QUOTE
The LDS Church is well known for taking a lead in charitable work. It is also well-known for keeping God's commandment to His Saints to build and operate temples.


Do you have a source for that commandment?

Also, do you consider missionary work a charity? Why should religious organizations such as LDS be tax-exempt to do missionary work abroad(non-US)???

QUOTE
Anyway, your screen name proclaims that you are a liberal. Isn't big government supposed to house and feed the poor? Why should the tithing of ordinary struggling church members take on that burden?


Yes...but my signature line states my feeling about religion. smile.gif
CowboySteve
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 06:34 PM) *
The frequency of divorce is definetly a social problem in our society with all too many children growing up in single parent homes and not having the benefit of witnessing both male and female role models in their home.

But contrast that with the laws in some countries such as the Philippines where there is no divorce, only possible anullments after seven years of separation. That obviously creates many long-term social problems too.


Let's be clear. Unlike the topic of same-sex marriage, which is not addressed in the Gospels, the clear, unambiguous, and authoritative teaching of Jesus Christ is that divorce is adultery. Are you telling me that the LDS/Mormon Church overlooks this clear teaching of Jesus Christ for the purpose of avoiding long-term social problems?
justamere10
QUOTE (madame-defarge @ Jun 3 2008, 07:24 PM) *
Wait! Just a minute here, justa... Do you mean to tell us that Mormon Bishops and stake presidents are Celibate too???? Who knew????? There's a p.r. campaign chomping at the bit to counter-balance all the FLDS media going down around town.

Have to admit though, you got me to pull out the Swedenborg (Swedish Mystic 1688-1742). An Adept. Found these passages which I feel are sure flavoring for the conversation at hand:

"As man is formed, so is he perfected in intelligence and wisdom, and becomes a man. No man is a man from his natural mind; from that he is rather a beast. He becomes a man through intelligence and wisdom from the Lord, and so far as he is intelligent and wise he is a beautiful man and an angel of heaven. But so far as he rejects, suffocates, and perverts the truths and goods of the Word... and... rejects intelligences and wisdom, so far he is a monster and not a man, because he is so far a devil"....

"God, in accordance with his laws, is able to remit sins to any man only so far as the man, in accordance with his laws, refrains from them. God is able to regenerate a man spiritually only so far as the man, in accordance with his laws regenerates himself naturally. God is in an unceasing endeavor to regenerate man, and thus save him. But this He is unable to accomplish except as man prepares himself as a receptacle, and thus levels the way and opens the door for God."


Almost all worthy adult members of the LDS Church male and female serve temporarily in volunteer callings. That includes bishops and stake presidents who usually serve about five years. There is no requirement of celibacy for adults holding any office or responsibity in the Church. Marriage of man and woman is considered highly desirable both for time, and if worthy, for all eternity.

You quote wise words from a wise man.
justamere10
QUOTE (Tyo @ Jun 3 2008, 07:31 PM) *
I think that if you are truly concerned about marriage and the sanctity thereof you might want to push for making divorce illegal or at least forbidding Mormons to take advantage it.

Who knows whether or not Jesus would have approved of same-sex marriage? He's not on record as having expressed an opinion. But he or his creators were pretty clear on divorce it seems like. Yet, Mormons get divorced every day. According to the link, which references a Utah State University site (it's a few years old, but I doubt that things have changed much) the marriage rate in Utah is slightly higher than the national average. So is the divorce rate. Even though Jesus was pretty unambiguous in his condemnation of splitting the sheets.


Actually the divorce rate of LDS temple marriages is far lower than that of the rest of the population. Here are a few extracts from a talk by a Church leader, given October, 2007:


Now, even as someone begins to understand a few facts about us and comes to know us more accurately by our faith and the importance of family, it was the Savior who said "by their fruits ye shall know them" (Matthew 7:20; emphasis added). A church, or any way of life, should be judged by the fruits or the results that it generates. Here are a few examples based on United States statistics. But these would be similar throughout the world among practicing Mormons (by which we mean those who attend church and the temple regularly):

  • One of the fruits is a longer life. Studies show that practicing Mormons are healthier and therefore live longer than the national average. In 1833 the Lord revealed to Joseph Smith the Word of Wisdom, which is the way to live in order to enjoy a long and healthy life.
  • Second, those who are married in and attend the temple regularly have a divorce rate far below the national and world average.
  • Third, we achieve an educational level that is higher than the national average.
  • Fourth, over 70,000 members volunteer at their own expense to serve for 18 to 24 months in humanitarian efforts, Church service assignments, and full-time missionary service throughout the world.
  • And fifth, we place strong emphasis on self-reliance and a solid work ethic. We encourage active involvement in our communities and in providing service to others. The Church continues to donate substantial money, goods, and services to humanitarian causes around the globe, including untold hours of labor donated by members to assist in disaster cleanup and relief.
justamere10
QUOTE (CowboySteve @ Jun 3 2008, 08:48 PM) *
First, I just want to apologize if I seem too harsh. The price of advocacy of a position or another is rigorous scrutiny. I certainly do not wish to seem contemptuous towards you in my probing of the underpinnings of LDS, nor to cause you more discomfort than that which comes from vigorous inquiry.

I see the racism of America manifested in the church, and am pleased that it has been addressed.


Thank-you Cowboy, that was a noble (and unexpected) post. :-)
Tyo
Doesn't matter how low the divorce figures are, the Church still allows it in contradiction to what Christ expressly taught. How do they justify that?
justamere10
QUOTE (RealLiberal1 @ Jun 3 2008, 08:54 PM) *
quote from justamere10:

Do you have a source for that commandment?

Also, do you consider missionary work a charity? Why should religious organizations such as LDS be tax-exempt to do missionary work abroad(non-US)???

Yes...but my signature line states my feeling about religion. smile.gif


Missionary work in the LDS Church is done by unpaid volunteers, as I explained earlier. Missionaries who have an income from investments or whatever while they are serving pay income taxes like everyone else does.

I'm glad to meet someone who apparently enjoys paying income tax. :-)
Tyo
QUOTE (justamere10 @ Jun 3 2008, 08:56 PM) *
Thank-you Cowboy, that was a noble (and unexpected) post. :-)


Cowboy is cool that way. To everyone.


This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.