Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Beginning of the End in Iraq?
Randi Rhodes Message Board > Main Forums > Focused Interests > Iraq / Afghanistan
CowboySteve
Usually this is a sign of handing over the failed occupation to a new strong-man. That's what the Brits did whien THEY failed in Iraq in the '30's.

QUOTE
5 years on, Saddam’s successor resurfaces Nicola Nasser For the first time since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in April 2003, the deputy of Saddam Hussein, the late President of Iraq, Izzat Ibrahim Addouri has resurfaced, despite a $10 million U.S. bounty on his head, in a lengthy interview with Abdel-Azim Manaf, the editor-in-chief of the Egyptian newspaper Al-Mawqif Al-Arabi, not a mainstream, on May 26 to lay out the strategy and tactics of the Iraqi resistance led by the former ruling party, Al-Baath.
Addouri's resurface and the resistance strategy he has laid out represent a direct challenge to the U.S. occupying power. Manaf told The Associated Press (AP) he interviewed addouri "on the battlefield." The "dialogue" was conducted "with a commander in his lion's den and among his soldiers," in the "war zone" and on the "combat field while weapons were talking," Manaf said in his introduction. Addouri spoke in his capacity as "the Supreme Commander of the Jihad and Liberation Front, the Pan-Arab Secretary General of the Al-Baath Arab Socialist Party and the Secretary of Iraq Region," the Egyptian editor added. The AP said "Addouri is believed to play an important role in financing" the resistance, "though little is known about how directly he leads fighters on the ground." However the U.S. occupying power, as well as Iran and the Iranian-allied regime Washington brought about in Baghdad after the occupation, have been keen to downplay the role played by Addouri and his party in the national resistance and instead highlight the marginal role played by Al-Qaeda, which was brought into Iraq for the first time ever thanks to U.S., and other Islamists. If history could illuminate current events, Addouri's reference to this "blackout" media policy is vindicated by the precedent of the U.S. – British planning for the coup that brought down the Iranian leader Mohamed Musaddiq's government in August 1953, which installed the Shah in power. "One key aspect of the plot was to portray the demonstrating mobs (against Musaddiq, which was "a mercenary mob. It had no ideology. The mob was paid for by American dollars.") as supporters of the Iranian Communist Party - Tudeh … As in every other British and US military intervention until the collapse of the USSR, the 'communist threat' scenario was deployed as the Official Story … The real threat of nationalism (and dirtier aims like protecting oil profits) were downplayed or removed from the picture presented to the public." [Mark Curtis, "Web of Deciet," Vintage, 2003] In Iraq, the U.S. propaganda machine has only replaced the "communist threat" by that of Al-Qaeda. Manaf, in his introduction, noted how much Addouri was a dedicated religious man, very well versed in Islamic theology and Arab history, and familiar with Sufism.
LINK.
Ultrablue1
The U.S. is in the middle of a hornet's nest in Iraq. If their government actually considers taking this deal on the table from Cheney and Bush, I expect all hell to break loose. The Iraqi people do NOT want us to occupy their country and will start taking it out on the soldiers. I fear something terrible is going to happen if we don't get the hell out of that country.

Let alone the fact Addouri has resurfaced, Muqtada al-Sadr is still around and can fire up his followers at any given time. If all these different factions take aim at the U.S. military at once, it could become a blood bath.

That scares the hell out of me. For some reason, something in my gut is telling me things are going to drastically change in Iraq late this summer and it isn't going to be for the better.

Thanks for posting this Cowboy. I hadn't seen this article. wink.gif
carmenjonze
QUOTE (CowboySteve @ Jun 5 2008, 09:30 PM) *
Usually this is a sign of handing over the failed occupation to a new strong-man. That's what the Brits did whien THEY failed in Iraq in the '30's.

[/i]LINK.


Frontier Post is one of the most interesting papers to read on the topic. Some months, they are totally shut down.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.