A disgruntled local official opened fire Monday on U.S. soldiers attending a municipal council meeting southeast of Baghdad, killing two of them and wounding four other Americans, U.S. and Iraqi officials said.

Total in Iraq - 4,106

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080623/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

A disgruntled local official opened fire Monday on U.S. soldiers attending a municipal council meeting southeast of Baghdad, killing two of them and wounding four other Americans, U.S. and Iraqi officials said.

Total in Iraq - 4,106

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080623/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

Exactly.

And they say Iraq is doing so well. (I hate the word surge)

Oh, how time goes by so slowly. Certainly not fast enought for me, and especially for the G.I. and their families, and of course the Iraqi people. Common sense tells us to get our troops home now - stop this deadly error, please, and let the Iraqi people live in peace, please.

If you must fight the War on Terror . . . wait, first I have to quote my eloquent friend on this:

If we are fighting a war against "TERROR", then we have no specific enemies. We are fighting a feeling, if you take Bush at his actual word. More likely, he is trying to wage a war on a tactic: TERRORISM. I fail to see how killing innocent people in foreign lands will put a stop to terrorism. It is a way to encourage terrorism. ~ Eyeswideopen

Secondly, we should be in Afghanistan/Pakistan, right? And I hear today that more soldiers were killed there, than in Iraq in June. And some NATO troops are pulling out because they can't understand the craziness and futility of U.S. policy there.

Oh how I wish someone had granted Clinton or Gore a term in office in 2000. We all know THEY would have used other means to hunt down those terrorist killers.