QUOTE (gutterballz @ Jul 5 2008, 04:53 PM)

Are you trying to prove your points or mine? That article tells you things I already said
From your (2006) article:
QUOTE
A year ago NASCAR CEO Brian France condemned the flag on "60 Minutes" and reiterated his company's "commitment to diversity."
When I referred to confederate flag flying tailgaters being a handful in the south I was referring primarily to Talladega Alabama, which is what the article is about. The article even states that some of them do it just to join the controversy rather than any affinity for the flag. But, as I said earlier, the same people will be at other events in the region, it doesn't make those sports/events racist.
The artice further states:
QUOTE
Outside the South, the number of Confederate flags at races is low.
What I said.
You asked,
QUOTE
"has it been banned since
wondering?"
Well, the article says:
QUOTE
NASCAR, under France, has banned the flag from appearing in any official capacity or on any licensed product. In the 1990s, when the Sons of Confederate Veterans raised funds to sponsor a car that would feature the flag prominently, NASCAR denied the group's entry into the sport.
What else do you want them to do? They don't allow the flag in their broadcasts. NASCAR doesn't own the camping areas neighboring the tracks, but the businesses that do aren't going to invite 1st amendment lawsuits. Remember, the basis of our "free speech" includes that which we may find offensive.
Mr. Dan Wetzel of Yahoo Sports seems to have a general disdain for NASCAR punctuated by his potshot at the drivers for not partaking of his "op-ed" piece. I'm surprised the sport's most popular driver gave him the time of day. Then he insulted him. The drivers aren't politicians responsible to their constituency, they are sportsters responsible only to their owners.