QUOTE (bushwa @ Jul 7 2008, 10:47 AM)

Tree-hugging greenies? Gee, you almost make it sound like an uncomplimentary label.
That said, how do you suppose the tree-hugging greenies are getting around? Perhaps, aside from those who are not doing it on bicycles and skateboards, there are some viable alternatives also available to "volunteer first-aiders and drivers for the ACS."
BTW, as you follow the reports on "first-aid" folk and ACS drivers immediately with -
- is the implication really what you mean - that the agenda for GW and GN is in part to thwart volunteer efforts?
I'd always understood the basic agenda they shared was to get the government out of helping people - individuals, reserving its largess for a select handful of wealthy and well-connected people, firms and industries, with generous volunteers (aka "the community") taking over the helping-hand aspects.
I'd argue recent developments actually run contrary to their shared agenda, but for the fact that I don't believe they actually give a shit either way about those genuinely in need, and so caring about whether the community's help is truly available is irrelevant.
Thank you Bushwa for pointing that out. In my head I'm not putting Greenies in the same bucket, but I guess I did when I put them back to back like that.
I'm just so dang mad... Everyone wants lower prices but nobody want's to give up their air conditioning, their creature comforts, their routine. If that keeps up the government will be able to handle and absorb the unrest, arrest the occasional resister and we will fall into Fascism. It will be a silent coup.
I just hate to read about the real human suffering skyrocketing fuel costs are generating. That it's all by design makes it is terrorism for sure. OPEC announced if anyone bombs Iran the barrel price for oil will immediately be $400.00/bbl. I can't find that source on the internets, but that was news that I heard last week or the week before on NovaM Radio news.
Then you got ANWR and global warming and I wonder, 'What happens to the pipelines that are resting on top of permafrost when the ground melts?'
Bushwa asked:
QUOTE
is the implication really what you mean - that the agenda for GW and GN is in part to thwart volunteer efforts?
No, not at all; the former doesn't give a rats ass about the has-lessors and the has-leasts. Indeed, this will be the Repukes opportunity to privatize first-aid. As far as the Greenies go...I guess I'm getting too much of an earful of complaining about the Greenies from my Conservative Republican sister and from my brother-in-law, the Conservative Republican who live in Alberta, (they're over run with spotted owls now, poor dears, and because they invest they know how Greenies can stall a project and drive up costs indefinitely for the minutest things so they see Greenies from a different angle than I do). (p.s., I did not know that Greenies also want smaller government)
Personally I think it's high time industry hired more Greenie design engineers/operating systems guru's and acted on their suggestions before they call in the investors. But I'm not to happy about them looking forward, almost, to $10.00/bbl oil because that's what they think it takes to get the sheeple's attention. There will be riots and destruction. before the sheeple wake up. HalliBurton is counting on it and has been building jails/detention centers all across America...just waiting.
If either Israel or the US bombs Iran...fuggetaboudit.