Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Hil on Supreme Court
Randi Rhodes Message Board > Main Forums > Heard on the Show
Stoon
Ok, I'm a little puzzled about this speculation coming up every now and then. Could someone explain this to me? I mean, isn't Hillary not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice? Don't you have to have judicial experience or be an expert on constitutional law to be a Supreme Court Justice? Someone with bigger brains than me explain what I'm missing.
danisnape
Here in Texas, we elect our judges. No legal experience neccessary.

(kinda think it's scary)
brotherdavid
QUOTE (Stoon @ Aug 27 2008, 04:39 PM) *
Ok, I'm a little puzzled about this speculation coming up every now and then. Could someone explain this to me? I mean, isn't Hillary not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice? Don't you have to have judicial experience or be an expert on constitutional law to be a Supreme Court Justice? Someone with bigger brains than me explain what I'm missing.
Well, let's see.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court...e_United_States

http://bensguide.gpo.gov/3-5/government/national/scourt.html

There are no requirements for judicial experience per se in the Constitution, but law experience is needed. Before she got her Juris Doctor degree from Yale Law School, HRH HRC interned at the Oakland-based firm of Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, which included support for Constitutional rights among its specialties, and she was on the impeachment inquiry staff during Watergate, for starters.

Personally, I'd prefer to see her as Attorney General or Health Care Tsarina or (shhh, don't tell Sen. Reid) Senate Majority Leader, not least because she wouldn't be locked into a lifetime appointment for future reference, but there's nothing officially preventing her being nominated as a SCOTUS Justice.

If she's fine with that, though, it's fine by me. HRH HRC did good this week.
Am still misty over her move to nominate Obama by acclamation.



light.gif clap.gif showb.gif clap.gif groovy.gif clap.gif light.gif


gutterballz
QUOTE (Stoon @ Aug 27 2008, 07:39 PM) *
Ok, I'm a little puzzled about this speculation coming up every now and then. Could someone explain this to me? I mean, isn't Hillary not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice? Don't you have to have judicial experience or be an expert on constitutional law to be a Supreme Court Justice? Someone with bigger brains than me explain what I'm missing.


she's an attorney
Randys
if mccain wins we cant even have these discussion, can we...

not saying dont discuss it, saying if you supported hillary then you must support obama...must

maybe she could be a SC...i sure wouldnt mind
Ishmael
I say Impeach Alito. HRC for Chief Justice.
captainkona
QUOTE (Ishmael @ Aug 27 2008, 11:00 PM) *
I say Impeach Alito. HRC for Chief Justice.



You know, I actually don't have a problem with Hillary being a Justice at all.

Imagine that.
5by5
QUOTE (danisnape @ Aug 27 2008, 04:52 PM) *
Here in Texas, we elect our judges. No legal experience neccessary.

rofl.gif rofl.gif rofl.gif

Save for the Courts of Appeals and Supreme which are appointed, judges ARE generally elected (making the Republicans claims about "judicial activism" - otherwise known as justice - being unsupported by the voters particularly assinine).

However, as to the QUALIFICATIONS to hold such an office in Texas? I understand the requirements to be, uh... FLUID down in those parts.... biggrin.gif
5by5
QUOTE (Ishmael @ Aug 27 2008, 08:00 PM) *
I say Impeach Alito. HRC for Chief Justice.

You'd have to impeach Roberts for that.

Which I would also approve of doing.

Who wants a troll as Chief Justice?

Dessalines
QUOTE (Stoon @ Aug 27 2008, 07:39 PM) *
Ok, I'm a little puzzled about this speculation coming up every now and then. Could someone explain this to me? I mean, isn't Hillary not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice? Don't you have to have judicial experience or be an expert on constitutional law to be a Supreme Court Justice? Someone with bigger brains than me explain what I'm missing.


You do not even have to be a lawyer to be on the Supreme Court.
NamelessGenXer
Around the time the primaries ended, I remember hearing some talking heads saying that a Law Degree is the only requirement for SCOTUS, and Hillary would indeed be qualified (sorry, no source for that).

I believe Hillary would positively THRIVE on the day-to-day efforts of Defending The Constitution, without having to be embroiled in the ugly, gut-wrenching, and never-ending business of Politics.
5by5
QUOTE (NamelessGenXer @ Aug 28 2008, 07:42 AM) *
I believe Hillary would positively THRIVE on the day-to-day efforts of Defending The Constitution, without having to be embroiled in the ugly, gut-wrenching, and never-ending business of Politics.

So do I.

And you can bet that bullshit anti equal pay for equal work ruling never would have come down against women either.
LibLaw
Senate Majority Leader, would be nice. nana.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.