QUOTE (Stoon @ Aug 27 2008, 04:39 PM)

Ok, I'm a little puzzled about this speculation coming up every now and then. Could someone explain this to me? I mean, isn't Hillary not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice? Don't you have to have judicial experience or be an expert on constitutional law to be a Supreme Court Justice? Someone with bigger brains than me explain what I'm missing.
Well, let's see.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court...e_United_Stateshttp://bensguide.gpo.gov/3-5/government/national/scourt.htmlThere are no requirements for judicial experience per se in the Constitution, but law experience is needed. Before she got her Juris Doctor degree from Yale Law School, HRH HRC interned at the Oakland-based firm of Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, which included support for Constitutional rights among its specialties, and she was on the impeachment inquiry staff during Watergate, for starters.
Personally, I'd prefer to see her as Attorney General or Health Care Tsarina or
(shhh, don't tell Sen. Reid) Senate Majority Leader, not least because she wouldn't be locked into a lifetime appointment for future reference, but there's nothing officially preventing her being nominated as a SCOTUS Justice.
If she's fine with that, though, it's fine by me. HRH HRC did good this week.
Am still misty over her move to nominate Obama by acclamation.

