QUOTE
Obama also allowed Hillary supporters to insert an absurd statement into the platform suggesting that media sexism spurred her loss and that
“demeaning portrayals of women ... dampen the dreams of our daughters.” This, even though postmortems, including the new raft of campaign memos leaked by Clintonistas to The Atlantic — another move that undercuts Obama — finger Hillary’s horrendous management skills.
Besides the crashing egos and screeching factions working at cross purposes, Joshua Green writes in the magazine, Hillary’s “hesitancy and habit of avoiding hard choices exacted a price that eventually sank her chances at the presidency.”
It would have been better to put this language in the platform:
“A woman who wildly mismanages and bankrupts a quarter-of-a-billion-dollar campaign operation, and then blames sexism in society, will dampen the dreams of our daughters.” http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/opinion/13dowd.htmlDon't always agree with the Dowd, and she is half right here, about Hillary and mostly wrong about Obama. I think Hillary is ready to be and should be point person to stave off this Palin-play.
Moreover, I believe in the wisdom of Obama and Biden: McCain has chosen Palin based soley on ideology, and not taking into consideration whether Palin can serve on
day one.
Whereas, Obama's #1 reason to pick Biden? Biden, CAN step in and be president at any time.
#2 reason to pick Biden? He wanted Biden's counsel, but he also wanted someone who would not be afraid to argue with him - Biden does not bite his tongue, and if Obama has any blind spots, there will be those surrounding him, I am sure (not just Biden) that can pick that up. Everyone needs help and one cannot be a leader without some degree of debate and having yes people all around you is self-defeating.
Apparently McCain will be just like Bush - yes people (owned too) all around the table - example - Palin.