In your article, you quoted McCain as saying that Joycelyn Elders said that "abortion has had positive health effects, including reducing the number of children afflicted with severe defects."

Without confirming to the reader whether she actually DID say that or not, or in what context she may have said that, so that people can understand WHY she may have asserted such a thing.

You also quoted a McCain accusation that "Elders continued a condom distribution program despite knowledge that the condoms were defective."

Considering the statistically high effectiveness rate of condoms generally, I find it difficult to believe that there was a whole batch of "defective" ones that were not recalled from shelves immediately, much less that a health professional like Elders would neglect to inform people of it if there was.

What confirmation of this did you obtain before reprinting McCain's highly political accusation?

Additionally, you also quoted McCain as stating that "in countries where condoms were distributed in schools that teen pregnancies actually rose."

Which countries?

By how much, if any?

You never verify for the reader whether this statement is true, or whether McCain is simply pulling this stat directly out of his ass.

Simply reprinting accusations and stats quoted by a politician without providing the public with any context as to whether they are actually TRUE or not, is irresponsible journalism.

It is not partisan bias to say, "Politician X said such and such, but this is not actually correct, complete, or independently verifiable."

Indeed it's you JOB to verify those facts. Do better.