I want to know what convention did this person watch. This is like Ron Furnier of AP:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/JI03Aa02.html

LOL a lot of crap. Spengler=PUMA.

FAIL!

From the article:

That is why McCain will win in November, and by a landslide, barring some unforeseen event. Obama is the most talented and persuasive politician of his generation, the intellectual superior of all his competitors, but a fatally insecure personality. American voters are not intellectual, but they are shrewd, like animals. They can smell insecurity, and the convention stank of it. Obama's prospective defeat is entirely of its own making. No one is more surprised than Republican strategists, who were convinced just weeks ago that a weakening economy ensured a Democratic victory.

Jesus.

Look, it is an article by a fascist writer in a fascist magazine.

What the hell do you expect?

Move on, nothing to see here.

I just saw this articel today....I was on The Google looking for stuff on Hillary to see what she will be doing and I was in the news section and I saw the title of this article. This is not a publication I read. This just has to be one of the strangest times and election seasons I have seen. Man I can't wait till November.

The Asia Times might not have the most reliable crystal ball in the business...

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/27/iranattackaugust/

the "insecurity" of Barack Obama