Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: FBI's role in 2004 election fraud revealed
Randi Rhodes Message Board > Main Forums > Focused Interests > VICTORY 2008
Morgan
September 3, 2008 -- FBI's role in 2004 election fraud revealed

As concerns increase about another fraudulent presidential election in the wake of two previous engineered elections in 2000 and 2004 through the use of pre-programmed electronic voting and vote tabulation machines, WMR has been informed by a high-level Democratic Party official in Ohio that the FBI was involved in throwing Ohio's 20 electoral votes to the Bush-Cheney column in 2004, denying the state to John Kerry, and as a result, keeping George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in the White House for another four years.

Our Ohio sources report that in the weeks before the 2004 election, the FBI assigned Stanley Borgia, an Ohio native and former agent for the Ohio Attorney General's Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation before joining the FBI in 1984, was assigned as the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Cincinnati Division. The assignment was a plum job for Borgia after he served as Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the Buffalo Division, where he supervised the investigation of the so-called "Lackawanna Six," six Yemeni-Americans from the Buffalo area who were charged with being members of an Al Qaeda "sleeper cell." However, those familiar with the case revealed the six traveled to Afghanistan but became so fearful of what they encountered in the Taliban-controlled country they wanted to return immediately to the United States. However, the successful prosecution of the "Lackawanna Six" raised Borgia's visibility with certain members of the Bush administration who saw him as useful for other operations, namely the 2004 presidential election in Ohio.

As the FBI's top man in Cincinnati, Borgia, who also previously served as Toledo Resident Agent in the Cleveland Division, cast a blind eye to reports of criminal activity involving the vote in various southern and central Ohio counties within the jurisdiction of the Cincinnati FBI Division. These included a reported FBI lock down of the Warren County administration building election night because of a false FBI terrorist threat received. Reporters were barred from observing the vote count during the security lock down. In addition, the FBI failed to investigate evidence of election fraud in Butler, Montgomery, Franklin, Hamilton, and Miami counties that involved undervotes for the presidential candidate, "spoiled" ballots, and suspicious activities of voting machine technicians working for companies like Diebold and Triad that were financially and politically linked to the Republican Party.

Borgia was not permitted to testify at hearings on Ohio's 2004 election fraud that were held by House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, in both his capacity as Chairman and ranking member.

On May 2, 2006, Borgia was rewarded with his inaction in investigating documented election fraud, federal criminal violations, and appointed by FBI Director Robert Mueller as Deputy Assistant FBI Director where he was assigned to be Director of Intelligence for the Department of Energy where he is responsible for nuclear security counterintelligence for Energy Department facilities around the country.

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20080903
carmenjonze
QUOTE (Morgan @ Sep 4 2008, 01:19 PM) *


QUOTE
This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click here

If you are already a member you can login by clicking here


Can't get there from here. Do you have another source for the FBI and election fraud?
martsmart
Oops...

Looks like someone didn't get the new rule memo.
Randys
Morgan, this will be your first and last free warning


22) Source your information. You must be able to provide accessible, linked sources for any information that you present as "fact" on the RRMB if a member requests your source or if you copy and paste part of an article. Sites that require payment or registration to view their information are not considered "accessible."

If your only source of information for a particular topic is an inaccessible site, you may copy and paste part of an article from that source provided you state clearly at the beginning of the post that your source requires payment or registration to read it and that you could find the information nowhere else.

When you provide a link to an article the link must go directly to the article. Do not post a link to a home page of a site that contains that article


randys
Morgan


Then you have cut Wayne Madsen off this message board. Let's be real about what this means.



AlwaysaLiberal
QUOTE (Morgan @ Sep 4 2008, 04:49 PM) *
Then you have cut Wayne Madsen off this message board. Let's be real about what this means.


They just want you to provide an actual link to the article.
carmenjonze
QUOTE (Morgan @ Sep 4 2008, 01:49 PM) *
Then you have cut Wayne Madsen off this message board. Let's be real about what this means.


Relax, all it means is to find a source that is actually quotable.

If you can't find another one but this one, just say so. That's what the rule states.
Morgan
QUOTE (AlwaysaLiberal @ Sep 4 2008, 04:51 PM) *
They just want you to provide an actual link to the article.


It was provided. But the whinners committee have their agenda.
Randys
QUOTE (Morgan @ Sep 4 2008, 01:49 PM) *
Then you have cut Wayne Madsen off this message board. Let's be real about what this means.

well, that would be nice. but if you read the damn thing again, you might understand...

you may copy and paste part of an article from that source provided you state clearly at the beginning of the post that your source requires payment or registration to read it and that you could find the information nowhere else.
AlwaysaLiberal
QUOTE (Morgan @ Sep 4 2008, 04:54 PM) *
It was provided. But the whinners committee have their agenda.


What is the problem? lol
Randys
it is too late for you to edit it and add the disclaimer, you will be expected to do so from now on
Morgan
QUOTE (Randys @ Sep 4 2008, 05:01 PM) *
it is too late for you to edit it and add the disclaimer, you will be expected to do so from now on


?
J2NYC
QUOTE
It was provided. But the whinners committee have their agenda.


That link will only work for Wayne Madsen subscribers. The rest of us get a page that says we need to subscrbe.

You MUST state at the beginning of the post that this is a pay site.
Randys
QUOTE (Morgan @ Sep 4 2008, 02:12 PM) *
?

i am going to give you the benefit of the doubt...last time


QUOTE
you may copy and paste part of an article from that source provided you state clearly at the beginning of the post that your source requires payment or registration to read it and that you could find the information nowhere else.

break down into sections

you may copy and paste part of an article from that source - such as wmr



provided you state clearly at the beginning of the post

that your source requires payment or registration to read it and that you could find the information nowhere else.
bushwa
QUOTE (Morgan @ Sep 4 2008, 01:49 PM) *
Then you have cut Wayne Madsen off this message board. Let's be real about what this means.



Not at all! Remember that someone recently assured us Wayne's blog is so widely carried by so many respected outlets that accessing Wayne's complete material WITHOUT having to pay for a subscription is a simple matter, even for an idiot like me? It should be that simple to provide a link to any of those other respected sources. And who was it who MADE that claim again? Oh, here it is. I found it:

QUOTE (Morgan @ Aug 29 2008, 12:14 PM) *
you know...it is YOU who needs to read slowly. You don't understand the simplest descriptions.
...
All you have to do is copy the 'headline'. Google it and VOILA! You got the whole article. (3rd time I've instructed everyone on this task)...


So, anyone wishing to post a full article from Wayne's blog that RRMBers can access per the rules need only follow the wise (and apparently irked) advice of the poster above in order to find it at a linkable site. After all, she explained it like THREE freakin' times.

Grannus
QUOTE (bushwa @ Sep 4 2008, 02:49 PM) *
Not at all! Remember that someone recently assured us Wayne's blog is so widely carried by so many respected outlets that accessing Wayne's complete material WITHOUT having to pay for a subscription is a simple matter, even for an idiot like me? It should be that simple to provide a link to any of those other respected sources. And who was it who MADE that claim again? Oh, here it is. I found it:

QUOTE (Morgan @ Aug 29 2008, 12:14 PM) *
you know...it is YOU who needs to read slowly. You don't understand the simplest descriptions.
...
All you have to do is copy the 'headline'. Google it and VOILA! You got the whole article. (3rd time I've instructed everyone on this task)...

So, anyone wishing to post a full article from Wayne's blog that RRMBers can access per the rules need only follow the wise (and apparently irked) advice of the poster above in order to find it at a linkable site. After all, she explained it like THREE freakin' times.

Oh snap!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.