QUOTE (dportjoe @ May 19 2008, 10:19 AM)

Electric is cool, but what about air power? It goes into production in 2010 in India, lots of video on Youtube. thing uses compressed air, a hybrid would be internal combustion compressor on board, which in theroy provides a one tank range of NYC to LA. Perhaps this kept so quiet because the French frim creating it has cut big energy right out. They view it as high impact in developing nations, with targets outside India including Mexico City. The compressd tanks are composit from Airbus (on beahlf or my sister and brothers at Boeing a loud compressed air hiss). Only problem I see (aside from point source fuel issue common to charging electic cars) is French vs American design views. Oh yeah emmissions filtered O at a reduced temperature to ambient. Uses one quart total lubricant.
QUOTE (21tikcah @ May 18 2008, 08:30 PM)

...
Energy transformation = heat/work/loss/waste.
The more different transitions that you make, the more energy you waste.
Power generated at power plant - fuel to heat [loss], to electric [loss], transported [loss],
stored in batteries [loss], transfered to motor [loss].
...
Same process again ... electricity to compress air - what efficiency level is the result ????
If it sounds to good to be true, it probably is !!
Gonna market it in Mexico ??? ... why not more lucrative markets like Europe and the US; if they really are more effective ????? Why not worlwide if it is infallible ???
Ethanol impracticability been reported on since 2000 .... but ignored !!!
Exposing the Corn-Based Ethanol Hoax as a Solution to Peak Oil April 16, 2007
Corn lobby's tall tale of a gas substitute
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_461.cfmMany Problems with Ethanol from Corn: Just How Unsustainable Is It? August 4, 2000
http://www.phoenixprojectfoundation.us/use...f%20Ethanol.pdfRunning on Empty: The Failure of Ethanol Aug. 16, 2001
http://www.mackinac.org/article.aspx?ID=3653The failure of U.S. ethanol policyhttp://www.env-econ.net/2008/04/the-failure-of.htmlGood for farmers for a while, terrible for the environment overall !
All these half-baked ideas seem to lead to one point - greater need for more electricity from coal ....
to process/manufacture .... ONLY !!!
Non-renewable ... keep you paying for ever !!!!
Worldwide, coal fuels 40 percent of all power generation.
"Coal will be cleaner ..." all industry lobbyist - B.S. ...
investing more in ads and political campaigns than research !
No Questions On Global Warming Asked At CNN’s "Coal Industry-Sponsored" Presidential Debateshttp://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/22/coal-cnn/Another Coal-Sponsored Debate Without Questions on Global Warminghttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david...de_b_87988.htmlFuture Gen (carbon sequestration program - pump it under ground and expect it to stay there and not harm anything ??) .....
"cruel deception" ..... industry fraud !
...
On January 29, 2008, the Department of Energy announced it was withdrawing funding from FutureGen, effectively terminating the project.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FutureGenBanks will not fund it !
Cleaner Coal Is Attracting Some Doubts By MATTHEW L. WALD Published: February 21, 2007
WASHINGTON, Feb. 20 — Within the next few years, power companies are planning to build about 150 coal plants to meet growing electricity demands. ....
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/business/21coal.htmlDeadly power plants? Study fuels debate...
2003 blackout slashed pollution
In a separate but related study, University of Maryland scientists reported Wednesday that the skies became dramatically cleaner when power plants had to shut down during the August 2003 blackout that hit the Northeast.
Measurements found a 90 percent reduction in sulfur dioxide, a gas that leads to haze and acid rain, and a 50 percent reduction in smog, or ground-level ozone. The amount of light-scattering particles in the air dropped by 70 percent and visibility increased by some 20 miles.
...
People dying prematurely from problems associated with exposure to fine particle pollution, or soot, lost an average of 14 years.
Power plant pollution is responsible for 38,200 nonfatal heart attacks and 554,000 asthma attacks each year.
Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida had the highest overall mortality rates each year, and West Virginia, Kentucky and Tennessee — states with a large number of coal-fired plants — had the highest per capita mortality risk.
...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5174391/Stop the global warming gangsters for good
Trent Hawkins 19 April 2008
http://www.greenleft.org.au/2008/747/38650Worst form of [multiple] pollution in the world ....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_effects_of_coalAuthentic research should be done - but the BUSH-it .....
is just that !!!! ___ nonsense Welfare for corporations .....
Solar and wind are here now .... both 100% pollution free in use ....
yet delayed/obscured by a lot of monopoly generated/motivated B.S.