Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: McCain Advisor - No One on One Interviews For Palin
Randi Rhodes Message Board > Main Forums > Focused Interests > VICTORY 2008
USA1
McCain Campaign Plans To Keep Palin Away From The Press

Yesterday, McCain adviser Nicole Wallace dismissed the fact that Gov. Sarah Palin has yet to take any questions from the press. “So what?” she scoffed. Today on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, campaign strategist Rick Davis suggested Palin might never sit down for an interview if, he said, it’s “in our best interest” to keep her away from the media:

SCARBOROUGH: Yesterday Nicole Wallace suggested that she was sitting right there and told Jay Carney of Time magazine ‘Sarah Palin doesn’t have to talk to you, she doesn’t’ have to talk to the press.’ … Can we expect Sarah Palin on Meet the Press and other one on one interviews throughout the course of this campaign?

DAVIS: We’re going to do whatever we think is the best to win. We have 60 days left and if we think it’s a good idea to go out there and do those shows, we’ll do them.

SCARBOROUGH: Can you avoid it? Meet the Press?

DAVIS: We can afford anything we want to do. … We’re going to do what we think is in our best interest. If that means access to the press, we’ll give it to you.

Watch it: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/05/mccain...from-the-press/

The McCain campaign reportedly told the Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder not to expect any one-on-one interviews with Palin any time soon. Despite McCain’s pledge of transparency — even proposing a regular President’s question time with Congress modeled after the British version — he has been shutting off press access for months. Yesterday, a Time reporter explained that McCain bizarrely refused to answer his questions, “like he’d been body-snatched.”

Davis insisted that “there are no strings attached” to media access to McCain. Yet just this week, McCain abruptly canceled an interview with Larry King as punishment for a tough CNN interview with one of his spokesmen. What’s more, top McCain aide Mark Salter said that “only the good reporters” would get the best seats in the new campaign plane. “You have to earn it,” he said.

Davis told MSNBC that Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) “didn’t do a single interview until a week after his nomination,” but the assertion is false. Biden and Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) sat for an interview with 60 Minutes “just moments after” Obama left the stage at the Democratic convention.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The are fucking losers ... this is already becoming the secretive "Status Quo" of the Cheney BushCo Administration.

Absolutely proves it's a sham ... She was trotted out like a Show Dog ... Walked around the Ring and Got Her Ribbon ... Now it's off to the next Doggy Show ...

No question and answer sessions - no real inquiry into how she thinks.

Just a DOG SHOW.

DOGS DON'T GIVE INTERVIEWS --- SHE'S IN A DOG SHOW. JUST SHIT AND PISS AND PRANCE AROUND.

USA1
Just a New Face To Catapult The Propaganda.

Same Old Same Ole.

I gotta get on Thom Hartmann Today.

NamelessGenXer
Uh-huh... THAT'S an excellent way for the #2 to go "on the attack".

More brilliant strategy out of the Grampy Camp...
bushwa
If you want the VP nominee interviewed by the press you are a SEXIST!


USA1
A fucking Pitbull With Lipstick ... You Heard it Here Folks, McAncient and Carabou Barbie AKA - THE DOG SHOW !!!

Woof Woof !!!

(Can someone crop a picture of a pitbull w/her face on it in the background a Plackard w/"GOP DOG SHOW!! - Catapulting The Propaganda, USA"

Thanks - I need to change my signature pic.

GCurry
Uh, so if the Republican PARTY thinks it's better for citizens to know LESS, or SPIN-ONLY on Palin, they'll avoid interviews.

And if the citizens of this COUNTRY want to know MORE? Interviews would be a good way to do that.

So much for "Country First".

(Epiphany! I just realized that the "country" in "Country First" is like in country-western, and is code for "redneck first")
toptier
They have an interesting, and possibly winning, strategy.

They've also laid the groundwork that the Press is being mean to her. They've had all sorts of surrogates spouting that she's been bombarded with inappropriate personal questions, even though not a one of them could cite a single instance.

But the "noise" of it is out there.

So they feel they can "control" what the public sees and hears of her, and they are only going to present the SP that was introduced to them during her nomination acceptance speech.

The public will be hungry for info, but the seed has already been planted that the media has abused her and will continue to do so. So the campaign is gambling that people's "protect the underdog" instinct will kick in and any time the media presses for access, the campaign will look like heroes.

Perfect strategy, if playing only to their base.

Not so sure how it's going to play out for the independents or swing voters. But it could be a winner if what is happening over the silly US Weekly story is true.

US Weekly carried the same story the other 2 rags did, but used a different tag line, "Babies, Lies, and Scandals."

There have been reports that people were outraged and there have been claims that something like 5,000-10,000 subscription cancellations because of it.

For the record, I quickly went and subscribed online. I hate that rag, but I considered it a "donation" to the Obama camaign!

cool.gif
NamelessGenXer
QUOTE (USA1 @ Sep 5 2008, 01:37 PM) *
(Can someone crop a picture of a pitbull w/her face on it in the background a Plackard w/"GOP DOG SHOW!! - Catapulting The Propaganda, USA"


Our own RRMBer Ian Shickle (sp?) has done a good job with this, IMHO...



USA1
BEAUTIFUL !!!

HA Changing it Right Now Thank You !!!
Gatekeeper
QUOTE (USA1 @ Sep 5 2008, 10:23 AM) *
McCain Campaign Plans To Keep Palin Away From The Press

Yesterday, McCain adviser Nicole Wallace dismissed the fact that Gov. Sarah Palin has yet to take any questions from the press. “So what?” she scoffed. Today on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, campaign strategist Rick Davis suggested Palin might never sit down for an interview if, he said, it’s “in our best interest” to keep her away from the media:

Davis told MSNBC that Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) “didn’t do a single interview until a week after his nomination,” but the assertion is false. Biden and Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) sat for an interview with 60 Minutes “just moments after” Obama left the stage at the Democratic convention.

Absolutely proves it's a sham ... She was trotted out like a Show Dog ... Walked around the Ring and Got Her Ribbon ... Now it's off to the next Doggy Show ...

No question and answer sessions - no real inquiry into how she thinks.

Just a DOG SHOW.


Well it's the Corporate MSM that is directing, and has been directing this country's "mind set"! The shilling comes when the Neo-Cons, thru their propaganda mill [MSM] puts out this BS by constantly implying we are "picking on" Sarah Palin by outlandish questions about the children. We get "gun shy" to ask pointed questions to her past! Sorry! We are being asked to "find her acceptable" without knowing her past.

http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=...mp;jumival=2232

She chose to be in this position! And all direct questions MUST be allowed to surface AND NOT be re-directed by either party! This is for the highest and most powerful position on the planet! We better get down with "knowing" who this person is and their ACTUAL character-not the politicos myths to get elected. THIS IS CHANGE. Anything else is BS!

Palin NEEDS to be totally vented before the public! No holds barred! And Straight Talk Mac needs to have his "mental and health ISSUES" vented without cherry picking! This guys health is definitely in question with three bouts with melanoma upon his skull! This guy is an unhealthy 72 yr old, just a heart-beat away from his final destination. And with an unvented , inexperienced and totally into herself personality [look at the children who must ACCEPT what Mom provides. My question is--what has this MOM actually provided her family? And now, she's

Sorry! But I personally feel his ability to control his behavior, has not been totally vented before the public, as well as his military records! This is for the presidency! There is no excuse to withhold info on any person[s] health and mental state.

Palin's being put in the VP slot even increases the NEED to disclose everything on Mc Cain! And also Palin's character and Integrity must be totally vented, without exception. We know nothing about this Neo-Con Governor of 22 months, who has a very "questionable" past as to ethics. And with 3 of 5 children still in need of a mother's guidance-with one[infant] who will demand an exceptional amount of attention and love -it does NOT look well for these children's future , with an UNHEALTHY person in the top seat. Of course, Rovians and the corporate elite love this situation where "the Maverick" may not be able to FINISH the term! Palin then steps in! WHO is this PitBull? Lipstick does not change the nature of the beast, whether it be PitBull or "Pig at the trough"!

To find the "real thing" always ask...when is it ENOUGH! Enough money, enough power, enough control, enough "lies" and un accountable parents and leaders. When is it enough, for Americans to say---ENOUGH! And mean it!

http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=...mp;jumival=2232

Enough Said!

rememberearth
rofl.gif
no pictures please.

can we get a "let em eat cake" with that?
HouTX-lil-J
This is unprecedented. I can't believe this shit. And the media is taking it Laying down with no lube. If we didn't know the news is owned by Republicans and Corporations, here is all the proof you need. Yet they will freely spew all of her hatred over the airways but won't question her.
whonew
Assume NOTHING.

Remember: Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people.
shoeshoe
QUOTE (whonew @ Sep 5 2008, 01:05 PM) *
Assume NOTHING.

Remember: Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people.

... or the abiltiy of Democrats to lose elections handed to them on a silver platter:

http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index...?showtopic=8355
Gatekeeper
QUOTE (USA1 @ Sep 5 2008, 10:37 AM) *
A fucking Pitbull With Lipstick ... You Heard it Here Folks, McAncient and Carabou Barbie AKA - THE DOG SHOW !!!

Woof Woof !!!

(Can someone crop a picture of a pitbull w/her face on it in the background a Plackard w/"GOP DOG SHOW!! - Catapulting The Propaganda, USA"

Thanks - I need to change my signature pic.

LOVE your Drawing!

It pretty well simplifies what we might be looking at with this person! It's a fair characterization, since the Repugs have NOT allowed the public to see what the make-up of this woman really is about. She has too many "loose ends" dangling about, where ethics and morals [Republican strongholds] are being called into QUESTION. The people have the "right and the responsibility" to know what their "leader" is about. Hypocrisy must be called into ACCOUNT especially with this highest of offices and representations! Germany called their elected personage...Fuhrer! Did Eva Braun and Leni Riechenstahl also wear "lipstick"? hmmmm

The same with the STRAIGHT TALKING McCain. Is he talk, all talk, BS, cover-up and re-direction, or is he for real , even with all his imperfections? The 1930's Germany thought they knew what their leaders were about, didn't they! But time provided a different perception! Of course, there are the party loyalists who will take it to their grave, in spite of the damage and hypocrisy presented to their nation AND the world. Love those "blinders"!

We all have the opportunity to choose! But the choices are very "limited"-all by Design [the play book]But, have we as citizens really taken the time, AND made the EFFORT to discern what is real: has it been authenticated[vented] by reliable sources; have we seen this BEFORE and in what form?

Our MSM is very much likened to Goebbels and Riechenstahls pattern of "PROJECTION"! For the most POWERFUL position in the world, personages will do anything, as clearly demonstrated here in America. Nothing "new" under the sun! In fact, the same "play book" has been implemented in Neo-Con perversions!

Do we need another BUSH or Mussolini? Whose going to watch, really watch the store and take care of the people? We are the United States of America, not the corporate elite, or Nazis Germany! angry.gif

Enough said!
Laura
Don't you see why? Look, next week there will be alot of shit about her. They don't want the press near her, because they will ask her about
(a) Troopergate
(cool.gif her daughter's pregnancy
© her purported affair
(d) the son whom you never see photographed with her

makes perfect sense to me! laugh.gif
Starbuck
QUOTE
... or the abiltiy of Democrats to lose elections handed to them on a silver platter:

http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index...?showtopic=8355


In order to believe this is true one would have to believe the narrative that essentially ignores the major election fraud going on in this country since 2000, the assassinations of the 1960s and the corporate media that pimps for conservatives.

Palin the lipstick wearing pit bull is no cowering in Alaska away from the media. Proud of your VP nominee now Republicans?
toptier
QUOTE (Laura @ Sep 5 2008, 04:30 PM) *
Don't you see why? Look, next week there will be alot of shit about her. They don't want the press near her, because they will ask her about
(a) Troopergate
(cool.gif her daughter's pregnancy
© her purported affair
(d) the son whom you never see photographed with her

makes perfect sense to me! laugh.gif



With all due respect, Laura, I think you are totally wrong there. I mean, in your list, not in the fact they don't want her questioned.

The media isn't going to ask her about her daughter's pregnancy, her alleged affair, or her son that we never see photographed with her (I don't even know what that means or implies!)

But they do not want the media to ask about:

1) Troopergate.
2) the list of the titles of the books she allegedly tried to ban
3) her connections with her pastors and the Dominionists
4) her supporting of the Bridge to Nowhere before her not supporting it
5) her justifications for her earmarks, in light of her claims of being a reformer
6) will she release her school records so we can see any papers and/or grades
7) why she attended so many schools and why it took her 6 years to complete a 4-year degree
8) why she didn't participate in or join any college clubs or associations
9) where the $20+M debt came from on her departure as mayor. . . . after walking into the position with a surplus and having had funneled in to the town an almost vulgar amount of earmarks
10) her alleged hacking into a state official's computer to steal his emails
11) her two-year gap in employment
12) her support for Ted Stevens, before her tepid non-support of him

Just to get them started. . . .

(EDITED TO ADD: They are probably also gonna want to get the answer to Campbell Brown's question: can she provide us with one decision she made or order she gave in connection with her "role" as commander-in-chief of the Alaska National Guard)
Laura
QUOTE (toptier @ Sep 5 2008, 04:46 PM) *
With all due respect, Laura, I think you are totally wrong there. I mean, in your list, not in the fact they don't want her questioned.

The media isn't going to ask her about her daughter's pregnancy, her alleged affair, or her son that we never see photographed with her (I don't even know what that means or implies!)

But they do not want the media to ask about:

1) Troopergate.
2) the list of the titles of the books she allegedly tried to ban
3) her connections with her pastors and the Dominionists
4) her supporting of the Bridge to Nowhere before her not supporting it
5) her justifications for her earmarks, in light of her claims of being a reformer
6) will she release her school records so we can see any papers and/or grades
7) why she attended so many schools and why it took her 6 years to complete a 4-year degree
8) why she didn't participate in or join any college clubs or associations
9) where the $20+M debt came from on her departure as mayor. . . . after walking into the position with a surplus and having had funneled in to the town an almost vulgar amount of earmarks
10) her alleged hacking into a state official's computer to steal his emails
11) her two-year gap in employment
12) her support for Ted Stevens, before her tepid non-support of him

Just to get them started. . . .

(EDITED TO ADD: They are probably also gonna want to get the answer to Campbell Brown's question: can she provide us with one decision she made or order she gave in connection with her "role" as commander-in-chief of the Alaska National Guard)


Yes, and all of those too! laugh.gif
TapDuncan
Whose breast feeding the baby? Someone ask her that. If my wife isn't lactating, then she can't feed it. That's why she is not in the photog's lensfinders, because she is not the mother. the only pics we see are of Bristol carrying the babe in swaddling cloth around, as if it was hers. I wouldn't do that to my dog or horse, let alone my daughter. Talk about evil ambition.

Toptier--She went to a private school in Hawaii, just like Barrack, but he's an elitist.
NamelessGenXer
QUOTE (Laura @ Sep 5 2008, 04:30 PM) *
Don't you see why? Look, next week there will be alot of shit about her. They don't want the press near her, because they will ask her about
(a) Troopergate
(cool.gif her daughter's pregnancy
© her purported affair
(d) the son whom you never see photographed with her

makes perfect sense to me! laugh.gif


Pisha... WhatsHerName will be far more prepared to answer those questions than ANYTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC POLICY.

My gut says she's in 24x7 lockdown, hoping to absorb in 30 days what Biden has learned about Foreign Policy and National Security in 36 years. (and perhaps a voice coach... )
toptier
QUOTE (TapDuncan @ Sep 5 2008, 05:11 PM) *
Toptier--She went to a private school in Hawaii, just like Barrack, but he's an elitist.



But she realized the horror of what she was doing and dropped out after about 2 weeks and ran back to the mainland.

Gatekeeper
QUOTE (Gatekeeper @ Sep 5 2008, 01:28 PM) *
LOVE your Drawing!

It pretty well simplifies what we might be looking at with this person! It's a fair characterization, since the Repugs have NOT allowed the public to see what the make-up of this woman really is about. She has too many "loose ends" dangling about, where ethics and morals [Republican strongholds] are being called into QUESTION. The people have the "right and the responsibility" to know what their "leader" is about. Hypocrisy must be called into ACCOUNT especially with this highest of offices and representations! Germany called their elected personage...Fuhrer! Did Eva Braun and Leni Riefenstahl [author and director of 1935 movie Triumph of The Will also wear "lipstick"? rolleyes.gif hmmmm

The same with the STRAIGHT TALKING McCain. Is he talk, all talk, BS, cover-up and re-direction, or is he for real , even with all his imperfections? The 1930's Germany thought they knew what their leaders were about, didn't they! But time provided a different perception! Of course, there are the party loyalists who will take it to their grave, in spite of the damage and hypocrisy presented to their nation AND the world. Love those "blinders"!

We all have the opportunity to choose! But the choices are very "limited"-all by Design [the play book]But, have we as citizens really taken the time, AND made the EFFORT to discern what is real: has it been authenticated[vented] by reliable sources; have we seen this BEFORE and in what form?

Our MSM is very much likened to Goebbels and Riefenstahl's pattern of "PROJECTION"! For the most POWERFUL position in the world, personages will do anything, as clearly demonstrated here in America. Nothing "new" under the sun! In fact, the same "play book" has been implemented in Neo-Con perversions!

Do we need another BUSH or Mussolini? Whose going to watch, really watch the store and take care of the people? We are the United States of America, not the corporate elite, or Nazis Germany! angry.gif

Enough said!

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.