How does Governor Palin treat the Inuit peoples and Alaska's First Nations?
PaleHawkWoman -> Sarah Palin's Record On Native Alaskan Issues (9/11/2008 10:00:45 PM)
This has been posted on several Native American sites concerning ongoing court cases and other issues involving Gov. Palin and Native Alaskans. I realize that what happens to Indians and Inuit means little if anything to most Americans, but it is important to us Native Americans. These are justice issues, and the Lord has always had quite a bit to say about how "the least of these" are treated. If one disregards the Lord's commandments, how can one call oneself christian? Gov. Palin has not shown any obedience to Christ nor love of her fellow man in her attitudes or actions towards Native Alaskans.
Elected officials take an oath to uphold the law of the land, both the US Constitution as well as the constitution of their state. In her actions Gov. Palin has apparently decided that neither she nor the state of Alaska is obliged to abide by the US Constitution.
1. Palin has attacked Alaska Native Subsistence Fishing
Perhaps no issue is of greater importance to Alaska Native peoples as the right to hunt and fish according to ancient customary and traditional practices, and to carry on the subsistence way of life for future generations.
Governor Sarah Palin has consistently opposed those rights.
Once in office, Governor Palin decided to continue litigation that seeks to overturn every subsistence fishing determination the federal government has ever made in Alaska. (State of Alaska v. Norton, 3:05-cv-0158-HRH (D. Ak).) In pressing this case, Palin decided against using the Attorney General (which usually handles State litigation) and instead continued contracting with Senator Ted Stevens’ brother-in-law’s law firm (Birch, Horton, Bittner & Cherot).
The goal of Palin’s law suit is to invalidate all the subsistence fishing regulations the federal government has issued to date to protect Native fishing, and to force the courts instead to take over the roll of setting subsistence regulations. Palin’s law suit seeks to diminish subsistence fishing rights in order to expand sport and commercial fishing.
In May 2007, the federal court rejected the State’s main challenge, holding that Congress in 1980 had expressly granted the U.S. Interior and Agriculture Departments the authority to regulate and protect Native and rural subsistence fishing activities in Alaska. (Decision entered May 15, 2007 (Dkt. No. 110).)
Notwithstanding this ruling, Palin continues to argue in the litigation that the federal subsistence protections are too broad, and should be narrowed to exclude vast areas from subsistence fishing, in favor of sport and commercial fishing. Palin opposes subsistence protections in marine waters, on many of the lands that Natives selected under their 1971 land claims settlement with the state and federal governments, and in many of the rivers where Alaska Natives customarily fish. (Alaska Complaint at 15-18.) Palin also opposes subsistence fishing protections on Alaska Native federal allotments that were deeded to individuals purposely to foster Native subsistence activities. All these issues are now pending before the federal district court.
MORE
http://forums.wpitam.com/m_3800101/printable.htm